When formatting for a hidden partition the user is prompted whether to allow >4GB files on the hidden partition but is not asked for the outer partition. Of course, there is a less resource extensive solution by using a global system hook ( SetWindowsHookEx) but this will definitely make the Antivirus bells ringing and we don't want that.Īs a conclusion, while this feature is very interesting, for now there is no acceptable technical solution to implement it.
This enumerating must be done periodically with a short period time and this will consume a lot of the machine resources.
#Veracrypt user guide pdf windows
The other difficulty is that we have to implement a monitoring thread in VeraCrypt that will enumerate all top-level windows on the screen ( EnumWindows)in order to find if the prompt message we are targeting is displayed. I'm not sure we can encode in VeraCrypt all possible values of this label. The first difficulty is to dynamically load the correct value of the label depending on the language of the machine. His idea is to wait for a dialog to be displayed that has the title "Microsoft Windows" and which contains a button with a specific label depending on the language of the machine ( it is "Format Disk" in English, "Datenträger formatieren" in German.) and then close this Window. I could not find any clean solution to disable this message and the solution propose in the link is a hack that is difficult to make it work across different languages. I will voluntarily refrain from the forum until your intentions are made clear on this thread, to save any unpleasantness. I simply do not believe after all the good work already done to VeraCrypt you will start to back down now and intentionally weaken it. Simple to use programs exist for these users already.Ĭlearly it is entirely up to you how you progress, your decision regarding this issue will be seen as an indication of your commitment to the policy of maximum security in VeraCrypt from now on and into the future. Once you start such appeasement it is difficult to stop. Please, please, please do not allow yourself to be persuaded away from the goal of the best security possible by pandering to suggestions to cripple VeraCrypt. Often I find the type mentioned above have little actual need for very strong security but by placating their demands to dumb down, will only weaken security offered to those who need it. I do not want to see VeraCrypt fall into the same trap.
#Veracrypt user guide pdf software
I suspect he is from a rival project or commercial software product, of course this will be denied :)Ĭatering to the lowest skilled and least security aware users with the poorest performing hardware is precisely what stifled Truecrypts development. No one could seriously suggest a delay in opening a volume should have any relevance on the decision for the secure number of iterations within veraCrypt. Re-reading proj964's posts it is clear I was subject to trolling and I regrettably took the bait.
0 kommentar(er)
